{"course":{"slug":"ai-for-students","title":"AI for Students","url":"https://addaly.com/learn/ai-for-students","level":"beginner","track":"work"},"lesson":{"slug":"explain-it-at-three-levels","title":"Explain it at three levels","url":"https://addaly.com/learn/ai-for-students/explain-it-at-three-levels","position":14,"of":73,"minutes":8,"answer":"Ask for the same idea below your level, at your level, and above it: the third pass names which parts of what you were taught are teaching approximations.","keyIdea":"Ask for the same idea below your level, at your level, and above it: the third pass names which parts of what you were taught are teaching approximations, and that is usually what separates a good answer from an excellent one."},"body":{"format":"markdown","text":"## Difficulty is a dial you can set\n\nOne of the new things these tools offer is control over the level of an explanation. A textbook is written at one level for everybody. A model will write the same content at any level you name, as many times as you like, and switching between levels is where a lot of the understanding actually happens.\n\nThe technique: ask for the same idea three times, deliberately.\n\n1. **At the level below yours.** Simple language, no jargon, an everyday analogy. This is where you find out whether you can hold the shape of the idea at all.\n2. **At your level.** Correct terminology, the standard treatment, the notation your course uses.\n3. **At the level above.** What the simplification hid, where the standard treatment breaks, what a specialist would object to in the version at level 2.\n\nThe third one is the valuable one and almost nobody asks for it. It tells you which parts of what you learned are true and which are teaching approximations, and that distinction is frequently exactly what separates a good answer from an excellent one in an exam.\n\n## An example\n\nFor *why does ice float*:\n\n- Level below: water molecules line up in a lattice with gaps when they freeze, so the same amount of water takes more space.\n- Your level: hydrogen bonding forces a tetrahedral arrangement in ice Ih, lowering density relative to liquid water at 0 degrees; density maximum at about 4 degrees.\n- Level above: this is specific to ice Ih at ordinary pressure; there are more than a dozen other ice phases, several denser than liquid water, and the density anomaly is a consequence of the directional bonding, not a general property of solids.\n\nThe third level is where you learn that *solids are denser than liquids, except water* is itself a simplification.\n\n## Analogies, and their expiry date\n\nAsk for an analogy and you will get one. They are useful and they all break. The important habit is to ask where.\n\n> Give me an analogy for how a neural network learns. Then tell me exactly where the analogy stops being true and what someone would get wrong if they took it too far.\n\nEvery analogy in science teaching has a failure point that a marker will probe. Electrons orbiting like planets: fails at quantisation and at what an orbital actually is. The cell as a factory: fails on scale, on the absence of a manager, and on the fact that everything is bumping around at random. Getting the failure point in the same breath as the analogy stops it becoming a misconception you then have to unlearn.\n\n## The Feynman move, and its honest version\n\nThe well-known technique is: explain the topic in plain language as if to somebody who does not know it, notice where you stumble, go back to the source for those bits, repeat.\n\nThe AI version people usually describe is *ask the model to explain it simply*. That is the wrong half. The valuable half is **you** doing the explaining. The correct use is:\n\n> I am going to explain X to you as if you are a bright 15-year-old who knows no biology. Do not help me. Afterwards, tell me: which parts were vague, which were actually wrong, and which I skipped over because I do not understand them.\n\nNow the model is a listener and a critic, and you have done the production. This is one of the best single uses of a language model in study, and it inverts what most students do with it.\n\n## Levels for reading, too\n\nThe same dial works on material you are struggling with. Paste the difficult paragraph and ask for it at the level below, then read the original again. The point is not to replace the original: it is to get enough of a foothold that the original becomes readable. Then read the original.\n\nThis matters for dense primary material: a paper's methods section, a legal judgment, a philosophical text. The simplified version is a ladder, not a destination, and the thing you will be examined on is the original.\n\n## The limit\n\nLevel control is only as good as the model's grasp of the subject, and at the level above it is generating what a specialist objection sounds like. On mainstream material that is reliable enough to be useful. On the frontier of a narrow field it is not, and a research supervisor will spot the difference immediately. Use level three to know what questions to ask, then ask a human."},"check":{"question":"What makes the third pass, the explanation above your level, the most valuable of the three?","options":[{"text":"It gives you vocabulary that markers reward, which raises the register of your written answers.","correct":false,"tempting":"Confuses sounding advanced with understanding; unearned terminology is one of the easiest things for a marker to expose."},{"text":"It covers material that will appear in later years, so you are working ahead of the syllabus.","correct":false,"tempting":"Treats level as syllabus position rather than as depth on the same idea, which is what the technique is doing."},{"text":"It is the level at which the model is most accurate, because advanced text is better represented in scientific training data.","correct":false,"tempting":"Reverses the reliability gradient; the further from mainstream teaching material, the more the model is generating what an expert objection sounds like."},{"text":"It names which parts of the standard treatment are teaching approximations rather than facts.","correct":true}]},"prev":{"slug":"follow-ups-that-find-the-weak-joint","title":"Follow-ups that find the weak joint","url":"https://addaly.com/learn/ai-for-students/follow-ups-that-find-the-weak-joint"},"next":{"slug":"conversations-have-a-shape","title":"Conversations have a shape","url":"https://addaly.com/learn/ai-for-students/conversations-have-a-shape"},"authorship":"Founder and series editor: Dr Mustafa Mun. Written by AI models to a written standard. Exam keys checked blind by a second model: 3,665 of 3,666 agreed. Academic review invited.","review":{"status":"Draft, open for academic review"},"cite":"Addaly (2026) 'Explain it at three levels', in AI for Students. Edited by M. Mun. Addaly. Available at: https://addaly.com/learn/ai-for-students/explain-it-at-three-levels (Accessed: 13 October 2026).","licence":{"name":"CC BY-NC-SA 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/"},"reader":{"schema":1,"title":"Explain it at three levels","courseTitle":"AI for Students","module":{"index":2,"slug":"asking-well","title":"Asking well"},"answer":null,"keyIdea":"Ask for the same idea below your level, at your level, and above it: the third pass names which parts of what you were taught are teaching approximations, and that is usually what separates a good answer from an excellent one.","hero":{"kind":"plate","image":null,"alt":null,"caption":null},"blocks":[{"t":"h2","id":"difficulty-is-a-dial-you-can-set","runs":[{"text":"Difficulty is a dial you can set"}]},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"One of the new things these tools offer is control over the level of an explanation. A textbook is written at one level for everybody. A model will write the same content at any level you name, as many times as you like, and switching between levels is where a lot of the understanding actually happens."}]},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"The technique: ask for the same idea three times, deliberately."}]},{"t":"ol","start":1,"items":[[{"text":"At the level below yours.","b":true},{"text":" Simple language, no jargon, an everyday analogy. This is where you find out whether you can hold the shape of the idea at all."}],[{"text":"At your level.","b":true},{"text":" Correct terminology, the standard treatment, the notation your course uses."}],[{"text":"At the level above.","b":true},{"text":" What the simplification hid, where the standard treatment breaks, what a specialist would object to in the version at level 2."}]]},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"The third one is the valuable one and almost nobody asks for it. It tells you which parts of what you learned are true and which are teaching approximations, and that distinction is frequently exactly what separates a good answer from an excellent one in an exam."}]},{"t":"h2","id":"an-example","runs":[{"text":"An example"}]},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"For "},{"text":"why does ice float","i":true},{"text":":"}]},{"t":"ul","items":[[{"text":"Level below: water molecules line up in a lattice with gaps when they freeze, so the same amount of water takes more space."}],[{"text":"Your level: hydrogen bonding forces a tetrahedral arrangement in ice Ih, lowering density relative to liquid water at 0 degrees; density maximum at about 4 degrees."}],[{"text":"Level above: this is specific to ice Ih at ordinary pressure; there are more than a dozen other ice phases, several denser than liquid water, and the density anomaly is a consequence of the directional bonding, not a general property of solids."}]]},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"The third level is where you learn that "},{"text":"solids are denser than liquids, except water","i":true},{"text":" is itself a simplification."}]},{"t":"h2","id":"analogies-and-their-expiry-date","runs":[{"text":"Analogies, and their expiry date"}]},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"Ask for an analogy and you will get one. They are useful and they all break. The important habit is to ask where."}]},{"t":"quote","runs":[{"text":"Give me an analogy for how a neural network learns. Then tell me exactly where the analogy stops being true and what someone would get wrong if they took it too far."}]},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"Every analogy in science teaching has a failure point that a marker will probe. Electrons orbiting like planets: fails at quantisation and at what an orbital actually is. The cell as a factory: fails on scale, on the absence of a manager, and on the fact that everything is bumping around at random. Getting the failure point in the same breath as the analogy stops it becoming a misconception you then have to unlearn."}]},{"t":"h2","id":"the-feynman-move-and-its-honest-version","runs":[{"text":"The Feynman move, and its honest version"}]},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"The well-known technique is: explain the topic in plain language as if to somebody who does not know it, notice where you stumble, go back to the source for those bits, repeat."}]},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"The AI version people usually describe is "},{"text":"ask the model to explain it simply","i":true},{"text":". That is the wrong half. The valuable half is "},{"text":"you","b":true},{"text":" doing the explaining. The correct use is:"}]},{"t":"quote","runs":[{"text":"I am going to explain X to you as if you are a bright 15-year-old who knows no biology. Do not help me. Afterwards, tell me: which parts were vague, which were actually wrong, and which I skipped over because I do not understand them."}]},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"Now the model is a listener and a critic, and you have done the production. This is one of the best single uses of a language model in study, and it inverts what most students do with it."}]},{"t":"h2","id":"levels-for-reading-too","runs":[{"text":"Levels for reading, too"}]},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"The same dial works on material you are struggling with. Paste the difficult paragraph and ask for it at the level below, then read the original again. The point is not to replace the original: it is to get enough of a foothold that the original becomes readable. Then read the original."}]},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"This matters for dense primary material: a paper’s methods section, a legal judgment, a philosophical text. The simplified version is a ladder, not a destination, and the thing you will be examined on is the original."}]},{"t":"h2","id":"the-limit","runs":[{"text":"The limit"}],"role":"limit"},{"t":"p","runs":[{"text":"Level control is only as good as the model’s grasp of the subject, and at the level above it is generating what a specialist objection sounds like. On mainstream material that is reliable enough to be useful. On the frontier of a narrow field it is not, and a research supervisor will spot the difference immediately. Use level three to know what questions to ask, then ask a human."}]}],"check":{"question":[{"text":"What makes the third pass, the explanation above your level, the most valuable of the three?"}],"options":[{"text":[{"text":"It gives you vocabulary that markers reward, which raises the register of your written answers."}],"correct":false,"tempting":[{"text":"Confuses sounding advanced with understanding; unearned terminology is one of the easiest things for a marker to expose."}]},{"text":[{"text":"It covers material that will appear in later years, so you are working ahead of the syllabus."}],"correct":false,"tempting":[{"text":"Treats level as syllabus position rather than as depth on the same idea, which is what the technique is doing."}]},{"text":[{"text":"It is the level at which the model is most accurate, because advanced text is better represented in scientific training data."}],"correct":false,"tempting":[{"text":"Reverses the reliability gradient; the further from mainstream teaching material, the more the model is generating what an expert objection sounds like."}]},{"text":[{"text":"It names which parts of the standard treatment are teaching approximations rather than facts."}],"correct":true,"tempting":null}],"order":[2,3,1,0],"why":null},"prev":{"slug":"follow-ups-that-find-the-weak-joint","title":"Follow-ups that find the weak joint","minutes":8},"next":{"slug":"conversations-have-a-shape","title":"Conversations have a shape","minutes":8}}}