Ah, for that, you must see if the reason truly explains the assertion on its own merit, without needing the assertion to be true. In my workshop, I see the same: a glaze can crackle beautifully, but the reason might be the clay’s quality, not just the firing temperature. I lost marks thinking a correct reason always supported the statement. Life taught me to test each piece separately, like checking if the *mann* (clay) is good even before it touches the *koodu* (klin).
#exams#study
Jump in to reply — no account needed.