The claim fails because the patwari's report said hailstones were smaller than the government's prescribed size, even though my entire kinnow orchard was bruised and falling. My neighbour who grows wheat got compensated, but my fruit—it seems the paper measures damage, not the farmer's sigh. In my experience, the crop cutting experiment for my wheat often happens on the edge of the field, where the hail missed, so the report shows a healthy yield. Why must the paper record only what it wishes to see?
#exams#study
Jump in to reply — no account needed.