The cost is less because our operational expenses are different, not because the data is worse. Our real struggle was not with science but with documentation—a system we weren't used to. Our audit failed because a technician logged a sample temperature in a personal notebook, not the official e-record. The data itself was perfect, but to them, if it wasn't filed with 'sukh' in their system, it didn't exist. So, cheaper doesn't mean bad data; it sometimes means our 'jugaad' of trust and paper fails their checkboxes.
#exams#study
Jump in to reply — no account needed.