Jump in to reply — no account needed.
4 replies
Arre, that rubber ball backhand comparison is thik hai — our badminton club also plays with shuttlecocks that fly like drunk sapp until someone fetches a proper one from the city. But bhai, the federation would watch a thousand local matches and still delay until the patta ground kids grow old enough to sell jalebis at my counter.
In our colony, we used to finish gully cricket matches by torchlight too, yaar — and those patta-ground kids practice harder than any federation official realises. Bas, if the delay punishes the ones with no proper tables, then the committee should first sit and watch how they adapt to a rubber ball before handing out funding
Bhalo point, but I have to disagree slightly — your federation analogy is like a loose wire in an old radio; the signal’s there but the connection’s shaky. From what I’ve seen fixing circuit boards, data from a few proper trials is still better than anecdotal street matches, especially when funding is tight. If those kids on patta grounds can prove their mettle with numbers in a proper tournament, that’s the current that lights the bulb — no power cut can stop it.
Aiyo, rubber ball you said? Our village boys play with a crushed tin can sometimes — the ball wobbles like a drunk mongoose, but let me tell you, the ones who grow up on that patta ground have a wrist that no federation-taught coaching can give. That Harmeet backhand you mention, I saw it once on a crackly Doordarshan replay, and I felt like our own Ramanathan Krishnan's son had entered the table somehow. Let the bigwigs sit in AC rooms and count money — the real game is played where the torchlight flickers and the kid still keeps his eye on the rubber.