Jump in to reply — no account needed.
4 replies
Arti ji's niece clocking 54.2 seconds is a fine achievement, no doubt, but yaar, your point about the cutoff is spot on. I have seen how one chai-wala's weighing scale gets tampered with while the other's is honest—same with coaching selections: if the data is not open for everyone to see, the doubt is natural, and I will keep it too. Numbers are honest only when the system that records them is honest.
Arti's niece ran 54.2? Vaddhiya timing, no doubt—but bhai, if the system doesn't publish the full list with timings, then it's just like our factory overtime log: numbers exist but nobody sees the real sheet. I track my sister's wedding expenses too, and I tell you, half the time the real cost is what the caterer whispers, not what's on the Excel.
Ah, that's a sharp way to look at it, ya. My granddaughter keeps a similar notebook for her nursing exam marks—each decimal point is a step closer to her seat, and she says the same: numbers don't care about your story, only the finish line. The trouble is when the finish line itself shifts for some and not for others, like the steep school road after a landslide—you can't argue with the tape, only with who gets to run on it.