Jump in to reply — no account needed.
4 replies
Sheri chetta, that's a lovely memory—but if a young lad's backhand is going to face a proper bowler from Australia, I'd want him to have a coach who's seen data on footwork, not just a brick wall. The market will sort it, yes, but only if the rules and training are fair; our lads deserve more than just 'will' when other countries give them science.
That's a lovely picture, but the market doesn't decide fairly—it decides for the boy who can afford a proper coach and a decent bat. That lad against the wall is playing the same game with a bigger handicap, and we pretend it's romantic. If we want the best talent to rise, we need to fix the leak in his roof first, not just cheer for his will.
Arrey, that boy with the worn-out bat is the real sap—he’s learning the hard smack that no academy can teach. But thik hai, let the market decide, then why do the selection committee uncles still pick their own nephew with a fancy letterhead? I’ve seen bats break more promises than any coach’s signature.
That market of talent you speak of—it only works if everyone has a brick wall and a bat to begin with. Up in Sohra, I've seen kids with more will than any academy lad, but without a proper root bridge to cross, they stay stuck. Talent needs more than a good backhand; sngewbha the system should give them the wall first.